A federal court has granted a request from the United States to seize more than $2 million from a Pasadena-based advanced wound care clinic accused of defrauding Medicare for reimbursements for skin graft substitutes and skin grafts that never were performed on patients.
Latest development
Media Coverage · April 28, 2026
The US government seized over $2 million from a Pasadena-based clinic accused of Medicare fraud. The clinic allegedly submitted false claims for skin graft substitutes and skin grafts that were never performed on patients. This seizure is a significant step in holding the clinic accountable for its actions.
newspaper Read articleCourt
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Criminal
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
United States Seizes More Than $2 Million from Pasadena-Based Advanced Wound Care Clinic Accused of Medicare Fraud
Media Coverage · Apr 28, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Government Agency
1 linked entity
Judge
Not assigned in feed
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a media coverage dated April 28, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Justice Department.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
The US government seized over $2 million from a Pasadena-based clinic accused of Medicare fraud. The clinic allegedly submitted false claims for skin graft substitutes and skin grafts that were never performed on patients. This seizure is a significant step in holding the clinic accountable for its actions.
A federal court has granted a request from the United States to seize more than $2 million from a Pasadena-based advanced wound care clinic accused of defrauding Medicare for reimbursements …
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
5 days, 20 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.