United States of America v. Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford
Case Summary
The United States government filed a lawsuit against Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford, case number 1:23-cv-00619. The government alleges that the insurance company has failed to comply with federal regulations. This lawsuit seeks to enforce compliance and potentially impose penalties.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Docket Snapshot
Court
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:23-cv-00619 United States of America v. Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford
Other · Apr 30, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff, 1 Related Organization
3 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 30, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford, 1:23-cv-00619 United States of America and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
About This Court
Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.
Case Timeline
1 event1:23-cv-00619 United States of America v. Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford
The United States government filed a lawsuit against Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford, case number 1:23-cv-00619. The government alleges that the insurance company has failed to comply with federal regulations. This lawsuit seeks to enforce compliance and potentially impose penalties.
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
19 hours, 34 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.