1:26-cv-01387 Flores v. Paisley Restaurant, LLC et al
Affidavit of Service Complaints ( 6
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. APPROXIMATELY 4,982,722 USDT; APPROXIMATELY 8,028,234 USDT; APPROXIMATELY 5,282,673 USDT; APPROXIMATELY 5,000,000 USDT; and APPROXIMATELY 3,827,942 USDT is a civil case with a docket number of 26-cv-01387. The current summary is a warrant in rem, with a total of 2 pages.
Latest development
Motion · April 24, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingCourt
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:26-cv-01387 Flores v. Paisley Restaurant, LLC et al
Other · May 05, 2026
Coverage
4 articles
4 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
6 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Paisley Restaurant, LLC, 1:26-cv-01387 Rodriguez (PS) and others.
Press monitoring has found 4 related articles from 4 distinct sources.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. APPROXIMATELY 4,982,722 USDT; APPROXIMATELY 8,028,234 USDT; APPROXIMATELY 5,282,673 USDT; APPROXIMATELY 5,000,000 USDT; and APPROXIMATELY 3,827,942 USDT is an active civil matter in Southern District of New York under docket 26-cv-01387.
The dispute currently identifies 1:26-cv-01387 Rodriguez (PS) on one side and Paisley Restaurant, LLC on the other. The case is currently organized around Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Government parties, public agencies, or official-capacity claims, Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement.
APPROXIMATELY 4,982,722 USDT; APPROXIMATELY 8,028,234 USDT; APPROXIMATELY 5,282,673 USDT; APPROXIMATELY 5,000,000 USDT; and APPROXIMATELY 3,827,942 USDT is a civil case with a docket number of 26-cv-01387. The current summary is a warrant in rem, with a total of 2 pages.
On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a other: An affidavit was filed. On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court denied a motion to intervene in the case Rodriguez (PS) v. Weiser et al, which involves a dispute over cryptocurrency assets.
The motion was filed by an unknown party seeking to join the case. The court's decision means the party will not be allowed. On April 24, 2026, the docket recorded a motion: A Motion was filed.
On April 23, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The US government has obtained a warrant to seize approximately $27 million in USDT, a type of cryptocurrency, as part of an ongoing investigation. The warrant was issued in a federal court in New York. This move suggests that the government is taking a.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.
An affidavit was filed.
The court denied a motion to intervene in the case Rodriguez (PS) v. Weiser et al, which involves a dispute over cryptocurrency assets. The motion was filed by an unknown party seeking to join the case. The court's decision means the party will not be allowed to participate in the case.
A Motion was filed.
The US government has obtained a warrant to seize approximately $27 million in USDT, a type of cryptocurrency, as part of an ongoing investigation. The warrant was issued in a federal court in New York. This move suggests that the government is taking a serious approach to enforcing laws related to cryptocurrency.
Affidavit of Service Complaints ( 6
Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis ( 1
Warrant in rem ( 2
Sources tracked
4 outlets · 4 articles
Timeline events
4 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 22 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.