newspaper
2:26-cv-01098 Erik Hansen v. Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles et al
Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60) ( 12
May 7, 2026
1 min read
legal-news
TYREE v. ONITY GROUP INC. et al
26-cv-01098
D.D.C.
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
The court denied the plaintiff's motion to amend their complaint in the case of TYREE v. ONITY GROUP INC. et al (1:26-cv-01098). This decision means the plaintiff cannot add new claims or parties to the lawsuit at this time. The ruling is significant because it limits the scope of the case and may impact the plaintiff's ability to pursue additional claims.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
fact_check
Docket Snapshot
account_balance
Court
D.D.C.
District of Columbia · D.C. Circuit · DC
tag
Docket
Not captured
Civil
timeline
Stage
Active litigation
Active
event
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
new_releases
Latest Filing
2:26-cv-01098 Erik Hansen v. Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles et al
Other · May 07, 2026
newspaper
Coverage
3 articles
2 sources tracked
groups
Participants
2 Defendants, 1 Plaintiff
4 linked entities
gavel
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of Columbia, a federal district court in DC.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 07, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles, ONITY GROUP INC, 2:26-cv-01098 Erik Hansen and others.
Press monitoring has found 3 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
About This Court
District of Columbia (D.D.C.) is a federal district court in the D.C. Circuit, DC.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
3 events
info
Other
May 7, 2026
2:26-cv-01098 Erik Hansen v. Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles et al
An affidavit was filed.
info
Other
May 6, 2026
8:26-cv-01098 Lee v. Wu et al
A Summons was issued.
info
Other
May 6, 2026
1:26-cv-01098 TYREE v. ONITY GROUP INC. et al
The court denied the plaintiff's motion to amend their complaint in the case of TYREE v. ONITY GROUP INC. et al (1:26-cv-01098). This decision means the plaintiff cannot add new claims or parties to the lawsuit at this time. The ruling is significant because it limits the scope of the case and may impact the plaintiff's ability to pursue additional claims.
Advertisement
newspaper
3 articles
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 3 articles
Timeline events
3 records on file
Last updated
3 hours, 21 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.