Civil Cover Sheet Filed in Trammell v. Apple Card
Case Summary
A Civil Cover Sheet was filed in the case of Trammell v. Apple Card. This document provides basic information about the lawsuit, including the parties involved and the nature of the claims. It is a standard procedural filing.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Pleadings
- • Case Initiation
Docket Snapshot
Court
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:26-cv-03600 Pacheco Jr. v. Social Security
Other · Apr 30, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 2 Plaintiffs
4 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 30, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Social Security, 5:26-cv-03600 Trammell, 1:26-cv-03600 Pacheco Jr and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
The Story So Far
Trammell v. Apple Card is an active civil matter in Southern District of New York under docket 26-cv-03600.
The dispute currently identifies 1:26-cv-03600 Pacheco Jr and 5:26-cv-03600 Trammell on one side and Social Security on the other. The case is currently organized around Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement, Claims pleaded in the complaint and early case posture.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A civil cover sheet was filed in the case of Pacheco Jr. v. Social Security, but it's unrelated to the Trammell v. Apple Card case. This filing is a standard form used to provide basic information about a lawsuit. It doesn't contain any substantive.
Social Security, which is unrelated to the Trammell v. This filing is a standard form used to provide basic information about the case. It does not indicate any action or development.
On April 28, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A federal judge denied a motion in the Trammell v. Apple Card case, allowing the lawsuit to proceed. The lawsuit alleges that Apple Card's algorithm discriminates against women by offering them lower credit limits.
This decision means the case will move.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
About This Court
Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.
Case Timeline
3 events1:26-cv-03600 Pacheco Jr. v. Social Security
A civil cover sheet was filed in the case of Pacheco Jr. v. Social Security, which is unrelated to the Trammell v. Apple Card case. This filing is a standard form used to provide basic information about the case. It does not indicate any action or development in the Trammell v.
1:26-cv-03600 Pacheco Jr. v. Social Security
A civil cover sheet was filed in the case of Pacheco Jr. v. Social Security, but it's unrelated to the Trammell v. Apple Card case. This filing is a standard form used to provide basic information about a lawsuit. It doesn't contain any substantive information about the case.
5:26-cv-03600 Trammell v. Apple Card
A federal judge denied a motion in the Trammell v. Apple Card case, allowing the lawsuit to proceed. The lawsuit alleges that Apple Card's algorithm discriminates against women by offering them lower credit limits. This decision means the case will move forward, potentially shedding light on the company's lending practices.
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
3 records on file
Last updated
14 hours, 27 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.