Ranked by recent case activity among canonical cases with this topic classification.
Active
Active litigation
76 topic score
D. Mass.
· 25-cv-13755
The District of Massachusetts terminated the patent and trademark litigation between SharkNinja Operating LLC and Ningbo Moetree Furniture Co., Ltd. The dismissal reflects resolution or settlement of the dispute, ending active proceedings in this matter.
1 event
1 coverage signal
3 entities
Active
Active litigation
95 topic score
D. Del.
· 22-cv-00904
Acceleration Bay, LLC sued Amazon Web Services, Inc. in the District of Delaware under docket 22-cv-00904, alleging patent and trademark disputes. The case involves intellectual property rights and likely centers on infringement or validity challenges against a major technology company.
1 event
1 coverage signal
2 entities
Active
Active litigation
76 topic score
C.D. Cal.
· 24-cv-07066
Dainese S.p.A., an Italian manufacturer of protective gear, sued Alpinestars USA Inc. and others in the Central District of California, docket number 24-cv-07066. The dispute likely concerns intellectual property issues such as trademark or design infringement related to motorcycle gear. The case is pending with no further substantive details available.
1 event
1 coverage signal
2 entities
Active
Active litigation
76 topic score
S.D.N.Y.
· 26-cv-00386
Southwest Airlines requested a 30-day extension to respond to a suit filed by Jones in the Southern District of New York, docket number 26-cv-00386. The extension request follows a notice of filing related to patent or trademark matters.
7 events
7 coverage signals
13 entities
Active
Active litigation
95 topic score
Court unknown
The document is titled 'Lanham notification,' suggesting involvement of trademark law under the Lanham Act. No further information about the parties, claims, or court is available.
1 event
0 coverage signals
0 entities
Active
Active litigation
95 topic score
Court unknown
This entry references a patent or trademark report without additional context. The court and docket are not identified, and no substantive details about claims or parties are provided.
1 event
0 coverage signals
0 entities
Active
Active litigation
76 topic score
C.D. Cal.
· 25-cv-12101
Ricos Tacos El Tio III, Inc. sued Starbucks Corporation in the Central District of California, likely involving commercial or trademark disputes. Recent filings include declarations, suggesting evidentiary submissions related to factual or legal disputes.
1 event
1 coverage signal
2 entities
Active
Active litigation
95 topic score
C.D. Cal.
· 26-cv-02122
Fundfi Merchant Funding LLC v. Fundfi LLC in the Central District of California was terminated after filing an AO 120 form related to trademark issues. The termination suggests resolution or dismissal of the intellectual property dispute.
4 events
4 coverage signals
7 entities
Active
Active litigation
58 topic score
C.D. Cal.
· 25-cv-07521
The Central District of California closed the patent case Wang Xizhe v. Wang Juntao et al, docket number 25-cv-07521. The closure follows a determination related to patent or trademark issues.
1 event
0 coverage signals
2 entities
Active
Active litigation
76 topic score
S.D.N.Y.
· 25-cv-07769
Patty Apollonia Kotero resolved a patent or trademark dispute with Paisley Park Enterprises LLC in the Southern District of New York, docket 25-cv-07769. The case closed following a Report of Determination related to intellectual property rights. The resolution indicates a formal conclusion of the dispute without further litigation.
5 events
4 coverage signals
6 entities
Active
Active litigation
76 topic score
C.D. Cal.
· 26-cv-04212
OnPath Federal Credit Union sued Ruiz, doing business as OnPath Credit Repair, in the Central District of California, docket 26-cv-04212. The case likely involves disputes over credit repair services, including possible trademark or unfair competition claims.
4 events
4 coverage signals
7 entities
Active
Active litigation
90 topic score
N.D. Cal.
· 26-cv-03139
Kasu Bedford IP LLC submitted a procedural filing related to a patent or trademark matter against Spruance in the Northern District of California. The filing involves a standard procedural form without substantive dispute details.
2 events
2 coverage signals
4 entities
Active
Active litigation
95 topic score
Court unknown
A new patent and trademark case has been filed, but no further details about the parties, claims, or court are available. The matter remains in its early stages with no docket information disclosed.
1 event
0 coverage signals
0 entities
Active
Active litigation
95 topic score
C.D. Cal.
· 26-cv-00285
Gibson, Inc. filed patent and trademark documentation in the Central District of California under docket 26-cv-00285. The filing duplicates an existing case against Eastwood Guitars, Inc., reflecting procedural steps related to intellectual property claims.
4 events
4 coverage signals
7 entities
Active
Active litigation
94 topic score
S.D. Fla.
· 24-cv-61080
Chanel, Inc. filed a notice regarding the expiration of a ninety-day deadline in a trademark case against allswisswatch.si and others in the Southern District of Florida. The notice emphasizes the importance of adhering to statutory deadlines in intellectual property litigation.
1 event
1 coverage signal
1 entity
Active
Active litigation
95 topic score
E.D. Tex.
· 24-cv-01055
In AR Design Innovations v. Bang & Olufsen, the Eastern District of Texas docket notes a filing of a patent/trademark form (AO 120). This filing relates to intellectual property rights but lacks further details on the dispute or claims. The case involves patent or trademark issues.
2 events
2 coverage signals
4 entities
Active
Active litigation
95 topic score
Court unknown
Array of Soap LLC sued Magnolia Soap and Bath Co. FRCH LLC and others for trademark infringement and unfair competition. The dispute focuses on alleged unauthorized use of trademarks and brand confusion. The court examined evidence of infringement and assessed damages and injunctive relief.
1 event
0 coverage signals
0 entities
Active
Active litigation
95 topic score
S.D. Fla.
· 25-cv-62501
On Clouds GmbH sued Onscarpe.com in the Southern District of Florida for trademark infringement and unfair competition. The plaintiff alleges unauthorized use of its trademarks on the defendant's website and marketing materials.
2 events
2 coverage signals
1 entity
Active
Active litigation
95 topic score
S.D. Fla.
· 26-cv-60598
Luxottica Group obtained a default judgment against nswez.shop in a trademark infringement case. The defendant failed to respond or appear, likely resulting in a favorable outcome for Luxottica on intellectual property claims.
1 event
1 coverage signal
2 entities
Active
Active litigation
95 topic score
S.D.N.Y.
· 25-cv-01763
Bliss Trademark Holdings, LLC filed a civil lawsuit against Blissy LLC in the Southern District of New York under docket 25-cv-01763. The latest docket entry is a Notice of Change of Address, indicating procedural updates without substantive filings reported.
1 event
1 coverage signal
3 entities
Active
Active litigation
95 topic score
D. Del.
· 25-cv-00385
Almirall, LLC reported patent and trademark issues in its lawsuit against Taro Pharmaceuticals in the District of Delaware. The case involves intellectual property rights and includes regulatory filings with the Commissioner of Patents.
1 event
1 coverage signal
2 entities
Active
Active litigation
46 topic score
S.D. Fla.
· 26-cv-22385
Carhartt, Inc. filed a civil action against various individuals and entities in the Southern District of Florida, likely involving intellectual property claims. The court issued an order, reflecting active case management.
1 event
1 coverage signal
1 entity
Active
Active litigation
95 topic score
S.D.N.Y.
· 23-cv-05138
Vinci Brands LLC received an extension to respond in a trademark-related civil suit against Coach Services, Inc. in the Southern District of New York, docket 23-cv-05138. The extension suggests ongoing negotiations or complexity in the commercial dispute.
1 event
1 coverage signal
3 entities
Active
Active litigation
95 topic score
C.D. Cal.
· 25-cv-02622
The Central District of California entered default against Monster Straw Co. in Monster Energy Co. v. Monster Straw Co., docket 25-cv-02622. Default entry followed the defendant's failure to respond or appear. The case likely involves trademark infringement or unfair competition claims.
2 events
2 coverage signals
6 entities