Home / Tools / Motion Explainer / Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law
Post-trial · Renewed JMOL

Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law

Asks after verdict to set aside a jury result because the evidence was legally insufficient.

Governing rule
Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(b)
Read the rule

What it is

A post-verdict motion asking the judge to set aside a jury verdict because the evidence was legally insufficient for the verdict that was returned. It renews a Rule 50(a) motion made during trial and preserves the argument that no reasonable jury had enough evidence to decide the issue that way.

When it's used

Filed after an adverse jury verdict when the moving party preserved the issue by moving for judgment as a matter of law before the case went to the jury.

What the other side does

The verdict winner argues the evidence supported the jury decision, the issue was not preserved, or the movant is improperly asking the judge to reweigh credibility.

Common outcomes

The court may enter judgment contrary to the verdict, order a new trial, deny the motion, or conditionally rule on a new-trial request.

Not legal advice. Motion practice varies by court, judge, and case type. Local rules and standing orders frequently modify the federal defaults shown here. If you're facing a motion or considering filing one, talk to a lawyer about strategy and timing for your specific case.