Home / Tools / Motion Explainer / Motion for Extension of Time
Pretrial / scheduling

Motion for Extension of Time

Asks for more time to meet a court, rule, pleading, discovery, or briefing deadline.

Governing rule
Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)
Read the rule

What it is

A request for more time to meet a litigation deadline, such as answering a complaint, responding to discovery, filing a brief, disclosing experts, or completing a court-ordered task. It is one of the most common procedural motions on any docket.

When it's used

Filed when a deadline cannot be met despite diligence, because of workload, new counsel, settlement talks, illness, document volume, discovery problems, or another practical obstacle.

What the other side does

The opposing side may consent, take no position, or oppose by arguing lack of diligence, repeated delay, prejudice, or strategic stalling. Many courts expect the movant to state whether the request is opposed.

Common outcomes

Often granted for a first reasonable request, especially when unopposed. Repeat requests, expired deadlines, trial dates, and prejudice make denial more likely.

Not legal advice. Motion practice varies by court, judge, and case type. Local rules and standing orders frequently modify the federal defaults shown here. If you're facing a motion or considering filing one, talk to a lawyer about strategy and timing for your specific case.