Home / Tools / Motion Explainer / Motion for Bifurcation
During trial

Motion for Bifurcation

Asks to split trial into phases, often liability first and damages later.

Governing rule
Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(b)
Read the rule

What it is

A request to split trial into separate phases, such as liability first and damages later. Bifurcation can make a trial cleaner, reduce prejudice, or avoid unnecessary damages evidence if liability fails.

When it's used

Filed before trial in cases where issues are separable, evidence on one issue could unfairly influence another, or resolving one phase first could simplify or end the case.

What the other side does

The opponent argues the issues overlap, separate phases would duplicate witnesses, confuse jurors, delay resolution, or unfairly weaken the story of the case.

Common outcomes

The court may split liability and damages, split punitive damages, separate claims, or deny bifurcation if one trial is fairer and more efficient.

Not legal advice. Motion practice varies by court, judge, and case type. Local rules and standing orders frequently modify the federal defaults shown here. If you're facing a motion or considering filing one, talk to a lawyer about strategy and timing for your specific case.