newspaper
5:25-cv-03021 Ja'Siri Ajai Harris et al v. County of San Bernardino et al
Miscellaneous Document ( 43
Apr 28, 2026
1 min read
legal-news
Tiffany Shernaman-Vinyard et al v. County of San Bernardino et al
24-cv-01468
C.D. Cal.
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
Tiffany Shernaman-Vinyard et al v. County of San Bernardino et al is a case filed in an unknown court. The case was filed under docket number 24-cv-01468. The current summary of the case is Miscellaneous Document (43.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Miscellaneous Document
- • 43
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
fact_check
Docket Snapshot
account_balance
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
tag
Docket
Not captured
Civil
timeline
Stage
Active litigation
Active
event
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
new_releases
Latest Filing
5:25-cv-03021 Ja'Siri Ajai Harris et al v. County of San Bernardino et al
Other · Apr 28, 2026
newspaper
Coverage
4 articles
1 source tracked
groups
Participants
1 Defendant, 4 Plaintiffs
5 linked entities
gavel
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 28, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes County of San Bernardino, 5:24-cv-01468 Tiffany Shernaman-Vinyard, 5:24-cv-02629 Sharonda Calderon and others.
Press monitoring has found 4 related articles from 1 distinct source.
About This Court
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
4 events
info
Other
April 28, 2026
5:25-cv-03021 Ja'Siri Ajai Harris et al v. County of San Bernardino et al
The court has filed a miscellaneous document in the case Ja'Siri Ajai Harris et al v. County of San Bernardino et al, which is a separate case from Tiffany Shernaman-Vinyard et al v. County of San Bernardino et al. This document is not a motion or a ruling, but rather a miscellaneous filing that does not affect the outcome of the case. The filing is part of the ongoing litigation in the San Bernardino County Superior Court.
info
Other
April 28, 2026
5:25-cv-00979 Frank Villaran et al v. County of San Bernardino et al
A new case, Frank Villaran et al v. County of San Bernardino et al, was filed in the same court as Tiffany Shernaman-Vinyard et al v. County of San Bernardino et al. This new case may be related to the existing case or may be a separate matter. The exact nature of the case is not specified.
info
Other
April 28, 2026
5:24-cv-02629 Sharonda Calderon v. County of San Bernardino et al
A new case, Sharonda Calderon v. County of San Bernardino et al, was filed in the same court as Tiffany Shernaman-Vinyard et al v. County of San Bernardino et al. This new case may be related to the existing case or may be a separate matter. The exact nature of the case is not specified.
info
Other
April 28, 2026
5:24-cv-01468 Tiffany Shernaman-Vinyard et al v. County of San Bernardino et al
The court entered a generic text-only entry in the case of Tiffany Shernaman-Vinyard et al v. County of San Bernardino et al, case number 5:24-cv-01468. This indicates that the court has taken some action, but the details are not specified. The entry does not provide any additional information about the case.
Advertisement
newspaper
4 articles
Press Coverage
newspaper
5:25-cv-00979 Frank Villaran et al v. County of San Bernardino et al
Generic Text Only Entry
Apr 28, 2026
1 min read
newspaper
5:24-cv-02629 Sharonda Calderon v. County of San Bernardino et al
Generic Text Only Entry
Apr 28, 2026
1 min read
newspaper
5:24-cv-01468 Tiffany Shernaman-Vinyard et al v. County of San Bernardino et al
Generic Text Only Entry
Apr 28, 2026
1 min read
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 4 articles
Timeline events
4 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 6 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.