criminal-case discovery criminal-law sentencing habeas federal-courts court-watch

Court grants in forma pauperis status to Thompson in Southern District of New York

25-cv-04226 S.D.N.Y.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The court granted the plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. This decision allows the plaintiff to proceed with their case without paying the required filing fee. The case is ongoing, and no further information is available at this time.

Latest development

1:24-cr-00332-1 USA v. Thompson

Order · April 27, 2026

A Motion was filed.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • Charge status, plea posture, and court supervision
  • Current docket activity and next procedural step
  • Habeas review and custody challenges
  • Criminal charges and procedural posture
  • Discovery obligations and evidence access
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

S.D.N.Y.

Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY

tag

Docket

Not captured

Criminal

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:25-cv-04226 Aminy et al v. NIC Fried Chicken Corp. et al

Other · May 05, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

5 articles

4 sources tracked

groups

Participants

2 Defendants

4 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes SUBURBAN NARCOTICS TASK FORCE, NIC Fried Chicken Corp and others.

Press monitoring has found 5 related articles from 4 distinct sources.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 6 days, 21 hours ago

THOMPSON v. SUBURBAN NARCOTICS TASK FORCE et al is an active criminal matter in Southern District of New York under docket 25-cv-04226.

The dispute currently identifies 1:25-cv-04226 THOMPSON, 2:26-cv-04540 FOUNTAIN, and 9:26-cv-80408 Leatherman on one side and NIC Fried Chicken Corp and SUBURBAN NARCOTICS TASK FORCE on the other. The case is currently organized around Charge status, plea posture, and court supervision, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Habeas review and custody challenges, Criminal charges and procedural posture.

The court granted the plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. This decision allows the plaintiff to proceed with their case without paying the required filing fee. The case is ongoing, and no further information is available at this time.

On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted an extension of time for the parties in Aminy et al v. NIC Fried Chicken Corp. et al to complete discovery, allowing them more time to gather and exchange evidence.

This extension is relevant to the Thompson v. Suburban Narcotics Task Force. On April 27, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A new case, FOUNTAIN v. THOMPSON, was filed as a petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus in the Northern District of Illinois, case number 2:26-cv-04540. This filing is related to the ongoing case THOMPSON v. The petition.

On April 27, 2026, the docket recorded a order: A Motion was filed. On April 27, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted plaintiff Leatherman's request to proceed in forma pauperis, allowing him to proceed with his case without paying the required filing fee.

This decision is significant because it enables Leatherman to continue pursuing his lawsuit despite.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

5 events
info
Other May 5, 2026

1:25-cv-04226 Aminy et al v. NIC Fried Chicken Corp. et al

The court granted an extension of time for the parties in Aminy et al v. NIC Fried Chicken Corp. et al to complete discovery, allowing them more time to gather and exchange evidence. This extension is relevant to the Thompson v. Suburban Narcotics Task Force et al case as it may impact the overall timeline for the proceedings. The extension is for 25 days.

info
Other April 27, 2026

2:26-cv-04540 FOUNTAIN v. THOMPSON

A new case, FOUNTAIN v. THOMPSON, was filed as a petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus in the Northern District of Illinois, case number 2:26-cv-04540. This filing is related to the ongoing case THOMPSON v. SUBURBAN NARCOTICS TASK FORCE et al. The petition seeks to challenge the detention or imprisonment of the petitioner.

gavel
Order April 27, 2026

1:24-cr-00332-1 USA v. Thompson

A Motion was filed.

info
Other April 27, 2026

9:26-cv-80408 Leatherman v. Thompson

The court granted plaintiff Leatherman's request to proceed in forma pauperis, allowing him to proceed with his case without paying the required filing fee. This decision is significant because it enables Leatherman to continue pursuing his lawsuit despite financial constraints. The case, 9:26-cv-80408, is related to the original case of THOMPSON v. SUBURBAN NARCOTICS TASK FORCE et al.

info
Other April 27, 2026

1:25-cv-04226 THOMPSON v. SUBURBAN NARCOTICS TASK FORCE et al

The court granted a motion to seal certain documents in the case of Thompson v. Suburban Narcotics Task Force et al. This decision allows the parties to keep sensitive information confidential. The sealed documents are likely related to ongoing investigations or law enforcement activities.

Advertisement
show_chart

Coverage Timeline

newspaper

Press Coverage

5 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

4 outlets · 5 articles

Timeline events

5 records on file

Last updated

4 days, 14 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.