legal-news

Tenaska Gateway Partners, Ltd. v. Integrated Service Company, LLC

25-cv-00172
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Tenaska Gateway Partners, Ltd. is suing Integrated Service Company, LLC in a case docketed as 25-cv-00172. The current filing is a substitution of attorney at docket entry 26, indicating a change in legal representation for one of the parties mid-litigation. Tenaska is an energy company; Integrated Service Company operates in industrial services. The dispute likely involves a contract or service agreement, though the specific claims are not confirmed in the data provided. A mid-case attorney substitution can signal strategic shifts or internal disagreements about litigation direction.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • • Breach of contract or service agreement between energy and industrial service firms
  • • Substitution of counsel and potential impact on litigation strategy
  • • Scope of obligations under the parties' agreement
  • • Damages calculation for alleged non-performance
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other April 20, 2026

6:25-cv-00172 Tenaska Gateway Partners, Ltd. v. Integrated Service Company, LLC

A substitution of attorney was filed in Tenaska Gateway Partners, Ltd. v. Integrated Service Company, LLC, No. 6:25-cv-00172, replacing counsel of record on one side of the case. New counsel steps into the existing posture of the litigation with whatever deadlines and obligations prior counsel held.

description View filing open_in_new
Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

2 hours, 9 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.