newspaper
civil-litigation
federal-courts
court-watch
TEJADA SUERO v. CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY
25-cv-01689
D.N.J.
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
The court granted a motion to dismiss a lawsuit filed by plaintiff Tejada Suero against Central Garden & Pet Company. The plaintiff alleged that the company's product caused an injury, but the court found that the claim was not supported by sufficient evidence. The dismissal means that the plaintiff's case will not proceed to trial.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture
- • Current docket activity and next procedural step
- • Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement
- • Claims pleaded in the complaint and early case posture
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
fact_check
Docket Snapshot
account_balance
Court
D.N.J.
District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ
tag
Docket
Not captured
Civil
timeline
Stage
Active litigation
Active
event
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
new_releases
Latest Filing
3:25-cv-01689 TEJADA SUERO v. CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY
Other · May 06, 2026
newspaper
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
groups
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
gavel
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 06, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY, 3:25-cv-01689 TEJADA SUERO.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
About This Court
District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
1 event
info
Other
May 6, 2026
3:25-cv-01689 TEJADA SUERO v. CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY
The court granted a motion to dismiss a lawsuit filed by plaintiff Tejada Suero against Central Garden & Pet Company. The plaintiff alleged that the company's product caused an injury, but the court found that the claim was not supported by sufficient evidence. The dismissal means that the plaintiff's case will not proceed to trial.
Advertisement
newspaper
1 article
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
7 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.