2:25-cv-17393 TAYLOR v. 240 REALTY LLC et al
Order of Recusal ( 129
A judge has issued an order of recusal in the case of TAYLOR v. 240 REALTY LLC et al. The matter is being heard in the District of New Jersey under docket number 25-cv-17393. The order was filed on page 129.
Latest development
Order · April 30, 2026
The court issued an order.
description View filingCourt
D.N.J.
District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:25-cv-17393 TAYLOR v. 240 REALTY LLC et al
Order · Apr 30, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
3 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated April 30, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
TAYLOR v. 240 REALTY LLC et al is an active civil matter in District of New Jersey under docket 25-cv-17393.
The case is currently organized around Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a order: The court issued an order.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest order produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.
The court issued an order.
Order of Recusal ( 129
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
5 hours, 4 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.