newspaper
legal-news
TATE v. TURNER
25-cv-03811
N.D. Ill.
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
TATE v. TURNER is a civil case with docket number 25-cv-03811. The current summary indicates that the court has granted an extension of time. The exact reason for the extension is not specified, but it is noted that the extension is for 105 days.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • extension of time
- • docket number 25-cv-03811
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
fact_check
Docket Snapshot
account_balance
Court
N.D. Ill.
Northern District of Illinois · 7th Circuit · IL
tag
Docket
Not captured
Civil
timeline
Stage
Active litigation
Active
event
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
new_releases
Latest Filing
3:23-cv-50449 Bunch v. Turner
Other · Apr 28, 2026
newspaper
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
groups
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
4 linked entities
gavel
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Northern District of Illinois, a federal district court in IL.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 28, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
About This Court
Northern District of Illinois (N.D. Ill.) is a federal district court in the 7th Circuit, IL.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
2 events
info
Other
April 28, 2026
3:23-cv-50449 Bunch v. Turner
The court granted an extension of time for the defendant, Turner, in the case of Bunch v. Turner (3:23-cv-50449). This means that Turner has more time to respond to the case. The extension is likely due to the complexity of the case or the need for additional time to prepare a defense.
info
Other
April 27, 2026
1:25-cv-03811 TATE v. TURNER
The court granted a motion to seal certain documents in the case of TATE v. TURNER, citing concerns for the privacy of the parties involved. This decision allows the sealed documents to remain confidential, potentially impacting the public's access to information about the case. The sealed documents are likely to contain sensitive information that could harm the parties if disclosed.
Advertisement
newspaper
2 articles
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 3 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.