Tamara Wareka’s suit against Me.Losangeles Aesthetics marked for dismissal in California
Case Summary
Tamara Wareka filed suit against Me.Losangeles Aesthetics Medical Corporation et al in the Central District of California, docket 25-cv-10665. The case is marked for dismissal, indicating a potential resolution or procedural failure.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Case dismissal
- • Medical provider
- • Civil claims
Docket Snapshot
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:25-cv-10665 Tamara Wareka v. Me.Losangeles Aesthtetics Medical Corporation et al
Other · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Me.Losangeles Aesthtetics Medical Corporation, Tamara Wareka.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
1 event2:25-cv-10665 Tamara Wareka v. Me.Losangeles Aesthtetics Medical Corporation et al
The court dismissed the case Tamara Wareka v. Me.Losangeles Aesthtetics Medical Corporation et al, filed under docket number 2:25-cv-10665. This means the lawsuit will not proceed, ending the dispute in this court. The dismissal could affect the parties' ability to pursue claims related to this matter elsewhere.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
10 hours, 30 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.