Tamara Wareka voluntarily dismisses case against Dr. Barrett Plastic Surgery

description

Case Summary

Tamara Wareka voluntarily dismissed her case against Dr. Barrett Plastic Surgery in the Central District of California, docket 25-cv-11876. The dismissal was filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), indicating the plaintiff chose to end the litigation without prejudice or settlement. The case will not proceed further.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

• • Voluntary dismissal
• • Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)
• • Plaintiff's decision

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

C.D. Cal.

Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:25-cv-11876 Tamara Wareka v. Dr. Barrett Plastic Surgery P.C. et al

Other · May 11, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 11, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Dr. Barrett Plastic Surgery P.C, Tamara Wareka.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

About This Court

Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Case Timeline

1 event

info

Other May 11, 2026

2:25-cv-11876 Tamara Wareka v. Dr. Barrett Plastic Surgery P.C. et al

Tamara Wareka voluntarily dismissed her lawsuit against Dr. Barrett Plastic Surgery P.C. and other defendants under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). This means she ended the case without the court ordering a dismissal. The dismissal likely avoids further litigation costs or reflects a settlement or change in strategy.

description View filing open_in_new