SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION by defendant Franchise Pictures, defendant Franchise Pic LLC, defendant Franchise Films LLC, defendant Elie Samaha, defendant Andrew Stevens, defendant Suite Productions to Ex parte application for relief from local rule 7-3a 657-1 (pj) (Entered: 07/11/2003)
Case Summary
Defendants Franchise Pictures and related entities filed a supplemental declaration supporting an ex parte application for relief from local rule 7-3a. The filing supplements prior motions seeking procedural relief.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Supplemental declaration
- • Ex parte application
- • Relief from local rule 7-3a
- • Defendant coordination
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION by defendant Franchise Pictures, defendant Franchise Pic LLC, defendant Franchise Films LLC,
Other · May 10, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
2 Related Organizations
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 10, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Franchise Pic LLC, Franchise Films LLC.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
Case Timeline
1 eventSUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION by defendant Franchise Pictures, defendant Franchise Pic LLC, defendant Franchise Films LLC, defendant Elie Samaha, defendant Andrew Stevens, defendant Suite Productions to ex parte application for relief from local rule 7-3a 657-1 (pj) (Entered: 07/11/2003)
An affidavit was filed.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
11 hours, 24 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.