judicial-watch

Stephanie Leon v. First Carolina Bank et al.

26-cv-03871
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

This entry appears to be a duplicate of case 16816, referencing the same plaintiff Stephanie Leon, the same defendants First Carolina Bank et al, the same docket number 26-cv-03871, and the same magistrate judge consent notice. No additional facts distinguish this record from case 16816. The available data does not explain why two separate case IDs exist for the same filing event.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • • Duplicate record of magistrate consent notice
  • • Banking or financial institution defendant
  • • Early procedural stage — no merits ruling
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other April 20, 2026

2:26-cv-03871 Stephanie Leon v. First Carolina Bank et al.

The court sent counsel a notice asking whether the parties consent to have a U.S. Magistrate Judge handle the case instead of an Article III district judge. Consent is voluntary — no party is required to agree, and refusal carries no penalty. If all parties consent, the magistrate judge gains full authority to try the case and enter final judgment.

description View filing open_in_new
Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

1 hour, 9 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.