Attorney Carlo Sabatini Files Restricted Statement on Social Security Numbers

description

Case Summary

Statement About Your Social Security Numbers (Document is restricted.) Filed by Carlo Sabatini of Sabatini Law Firm, LLC on behalf of Kimberly Christian Cohick, Matthew William John Cohick (RE: related document(s) 1 ). (Sabatini, Carlo)

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

Court not identified

Awaiting court metadata

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

Statement About Your Social Security Numbers (Document is restricted.) Filed by Carlo Sabatini of Sabatini Law Firm,

Other · May 13, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

Parties not parsed yet

0 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 13, 2026.

Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

Case Timeline

1 event

info

Other May 12, 2026

Statement About Your Social Security Numbers (Document is restricted.) Filed by Carlo Sabatini of Sabatini Law Firm, LLC on behalf of Kimberly Christian Cohick, Matthew William John Cohick (RE: related document(s) 1 ). (Sabatini, Carlo)

The plaintiffs, Kimberly Christian Cohick and Matthew William John Cohick, filed a restricted statement regarding their Social Security numbers through their attorney Carlo Sabatini. This filing likely addresses sensitive personal information relevant to the case. The court restricted the document to protect the plaintiffs' privacy.