Starr Indemnity sues Blue Ridge Indemnity Company with no recent updates in SDNY
Case Summary
Starr Indemnity & Liability Company sued Blue Ridge Indemnity Company and others in the Southern District of New York. The docket shows no recent updates, suggesting early or inactive litigation status.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Insurance coverage dispute
- • Contract interpretation
- • Initial pleadings
Docket Snapshot
Court
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:25-cv-05129 Starr Indemnity & Liability Company v. Blue Ridge Indemnity Company et al
Other · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff, 1 Related Organization
3 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 11, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Blue Ridge Indemnity Company, Starr Indemnity & Liability Company and others.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.
Case Timeline
1 event1:25-cv-05129 Starr Indemnity & Liability Company v. Blue Ridge Indemnity Company et al
The case Starr Indemnity & Liability Company v. Blue Ridge Indemnity Company et al was filed under docket number 1:25-cv-05129. This marks the official start of litigation between the parties, setting the stage for dispute resolution. The filing triggers procedural deadlines and potential discovery obligations.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
3 days, 1 hour ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.