legal-news

Defense Intelligence Agency Faces Summary Judgment in STAHL v. Defense Intelligence Agency

21-cv-02383
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) is facing summary judgment in STAHL v. Defense Intelligence Agency. The plaintiff, STAHL, is seeking damages for alleged wrongdoing by the DIA. The case is currently pending in the unknown court.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Summary Judgment
  • Defense Intelligence Agency
  • STAHL v. Defense Intelligence Agency
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

Court not identified

Awaiting court metadata

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:21-cv-02383 STAHL v. DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY

Other · May 01, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

1 article

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 01, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others.

Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other April 30, 2026

1:21-cv-02383 STAHL v. DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY

The court entered judgment.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

1 hour, 10 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.