Smith Sues Wayfarer Foundation in Northern District of Illinois
Case Summary
The case Smith v. Wayfarer Foundation et al was filed under docket number 1:26-cv-01940. This marks the official start of litigation between Smith and the Wayfarer Foundation and other defendants. The filing triggers procedural deadlines and sets the stage for discovery and potential motions.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Docket Snapshot
Court
N.D. Ill.
Northern District of Illinois · 7th Circuit · IL
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:26-cv-01940 BAYMONT FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC. v. SHIVPOOJA, LLC et al
Other · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
2 Defendants, 1 Plaintiff
4 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Northern District of Illinois, a federal district court in IL.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Wayfarer Foundation, SHIVPOOJA, LLC, 2:26-cv-01940 BAYMONT FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC and others.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
Northern District of Illinois (N.D. Ill.) is a federal district court in the 7th Circuit, IL.
Case Timeline
2 events2:26-cv-01940 BAYMONT FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC. v. SHIVPOOJA, LLC et al
The court entered judgment.
1:26-cv-01940 Smith v. Wayfarer Foundation et al
The case Smith v. Wayfarer Foundation et al was filed under docket number 1:26-cv-01940. This marks the official start of litigation between Smith and the Wayfarer Foundation and other defendants. The filing triggers procedural deadlines and sets the stage for discovery and potential motions.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
8 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.