Smith awarded $11,000 judgment against Village of Country Club Hills in California
Case Summary
In the case of Smith v. Village of Country Club Hills, the plaintiff, Smith, received a judgment in the amount of $11,000. The judgment was entered on an AO450 form, which is a standard form used in federal court proceedings. The case is now closed, and the judgment is final.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Judgment in favor of the plaintiff
- • AO450 form
- • Federal court judgment
Docket Snapshot
Court
N.D. Cal.
Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
3:25-cv-08682 O'Neill v. Dorsey et al
Other · Apr 27, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
4 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 27, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Village of Country Club Hills and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
The Story So Far
Smith v Village of Country Club Hills is an active civil matter in Northern District of California under docket 25-cv-08682.
The main identified defendant or respondent is Village of Country Club Hills. The case is currently organized around Judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Federal court judgment.
In the case of Smith v. Village of Country Club Hills, the plaintiff, Smith, received a judgment in the amount of $11,000. The judgment was entered on an AO450 form, which is a standard form used in federal court proceedings.
The case is now closed, and the judgment is final.
On April 27, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted a substitution of counsel in the case of O'Neill v. Dorsey et al, allowing a new law firm to represent the plaintiff. This change is likely due to a conflict of interest or other issue with the original firm.
The substitution will not affect. On April 23, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court entered judgment.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
About This Court
Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
2 events3:25-cv-08682 O'Neill v. Dorsey et al
The court granted a substitution of counsel in the case of O'Neill v. Dorsey et al, allowing a new law firm to represent the plaintiff. This change is likely due to a conflict of interest or other issue with the original firm. The substitution will not affect the underlying case, Smith v Village of Country Club Hills.
1:25-cv-08682 Smith v Village of Country Club Hills
The court entered judgment.
Coverage Timeline
Press Coverage
1:25-cv-08682 Smith v Village of Country Club Hills
Judgment - AO450 ( 11
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
5 hours, 52 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.