civil-litigation federal-courts

Smith awarded $11,000 judgment against Village of Country Club Hills in California

25-cv-08682 N.D. Cal.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

In the case of Smith v. Village of Country Club Hills, the plaintiff, Smith, received a judgment in the amount of $11,000. The judgment was entered on an AO450 form, which is a standard form used in federal court proceedings. The case is now closed, and the judgment is final.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Judgment in favor of the plaintiff
  • AO450 form
  • Federal court judgment
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

N.D. Cal.

Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

3:25-cv-08682 O'Neill v. Dorsey et al

Other · Apr 27, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

2 articles

2 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant

4 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 27, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Village of Country Club Hills and others.

Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 2 days, 10 hours ago

Smith v Village of Country Club Hills is an active civil matter in Northern District of California under docket 25-cv-08682.

The main identified defendant or respondent is Village of Country Club Hills. The case is currently organized around Judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Federal court judgment.

In the case of Smith v. Village of Country Club Hills, the plaintiff, Smith, received a judgment in the amount of $11,000. The judgment was entered on an AO450 form, which is a standard form used in federal court proceedings.

The case is now closed, and the judgment is final.

On April 27, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted a substitution of counsel in the case of O'Neill v. Dorsey et al, allowing a new law firm to represent the plaintiff. This change is likely due to a conflict of interest or other issue with the original firm.

The substitution will not affect. On April 23, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court entered judgment.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other April 27, 2026

3:25-cv-08682 O'Neill v. Dorsey et al

The court granted a substitution of counsel in the case of O'Neill v. Dorsey et al, allowing a new law firm to represent the plaintiff. This change is likely due to a conflict of interest or other issue with the original firm. The substitution will not affect the underlying case, Smith v Village of Country Club Hills.

info
Other April 23, 2026

1:25-cv-08682 Smith v Village of Country Club Hills

The court entered judgment.

Advertisement
show_chart

Coverage Timeline

newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

5 hours, 52 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.