Smith v. Target Corporation et al
Case Summary
The court has received a joint report from the parties in Smith v. Target Corporation et al, outlining their plan for discovery in the case. This report, filed under Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, is a required step in the discovery process. The plan will guide the parties' efforts to gather evidence and information from each other.
Latest development
1:25-cv-13225 Smith v. Target Corporation et al
Order · April 30, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingDocket Snapshot
Court
D.N.J.
District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:25-cv-16978 MAURER v. AT CORPORATION et al
Other · May 01, 2026
Coverage
5 articles
3 sources tracked
Participants
3 Defendants, 2 Plaintiffs
9 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 01, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes TARGET CORPORATION, Target Corporation, AT CORPORATION and others.
Press monitoring has found 5 related articles from 3 distinct sources.
About This Court
District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.
Case Timeline
5 events1:25-cv-16978 MAURER v. AT CORPORATION et al
The parties filed a joint status report.
2:26-cv-02327 Nicholas Paul Suquett v. Target Corporation et al
The court has received a joint report from the parties in Smith v. Target Corporation et al, outlining their plan for discovery in the case. This report, filed under Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, is a required step in the discovery process. The plan will guide the parties' efforts to gather evidence and information from each other.
1:25-cv-19053 MUHAMMAD v. TARGET CORPORATION et al
A Notice of Appearance was filed.
2:20-cr-00772-1 USA v. SMITH
The court issued a warrant for the arrest of defendant Smith in the case of USA v. Smith, a separate but related matter to Smith v. Target Corporation et al. This warrant was issued in a criminal case, not the civil case between Smith and Target. The arrest warrant is a significant development in the criminal case against Smith.
1:25-cv-13225 Smith v. Target Corporation et al
A Motion was filed.
Press Coverage
2:26-cv-02327 Nicholas Paul Suquett v. Target Corporation et al
Joint Report Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ( 12
1:25-cv-19053 MUHAMMAD v. TARGET CORPORATION et al
Notice of Appearance ( 10
1:25-cv-13225 Smith v. Target Corporation et al
Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim ( 51
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
3 outlets · 5 articles
Timeline events
5 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 1 hour ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.