2:26-cv-04801 Bautista v. Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security
Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties ( 4
The court denied a motion to consolidate the case Smith v. Georgia Nut Company with another case, 3:26-cv-04801 HOOKER et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al. This decision means that the two cases will proceed separately. The court's ruling will likely impact the timing and resources required for each case.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:26-cv-04801 Bautista v. Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security
Other · May 04, 2026
Coverage
4 articles
4 sources tracked
Participants
3 Defendants, 1 Plaintiff
8 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 04, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Georgia Nut Company, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security and others.
Press monitoring has found 4 related articles from 4 distinct sources.
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
A Notice of Interested Parties was filed.
The court denied a motion to consolidate the case Smith v. Georgia Nut Company with another case, 3:26-cv-04801 HOOKER et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al. This decision means that the two cases will proceed separately. The court's ruling will likely impact the timing and resources required for each case.
The court issued a notice in the case of Oakes v. Smith, which is related to the case of Smith v. Georgia Nut Company. This notice is likely a procedural update or a request for action from one of the parties involved. The exact nature of the notice is not specified.
The court granted a motion to seal certain documents in the Smith v. Georgia Nut Company case, citing concerns about potential harm to the company's business interests. This decision allows the company to keep sensitive information private. The sealed documents are likely related to the company's financials or trade secrets.
Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties ( 4
Sources tracked
4 outlets · 4 articles
Timeline events
4 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 4 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.