Smith v. Director, TDCJ-CID
Case Summary
The court granted a motion to consolidate the case of Smith v. Director, TDCJ-CID with another case, Droddy, Jr. v. Director, TDCJ-CID. This consolidation will allow the court to handle both cases together, potentially streamlining the litigation process. The consolidation may also impact the outcome of the cases.
Latest development
1:22-cv-00390 Smith v. Director, TDCJ-CID
Order · April 29, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingDocket Snapshot
Court
E.D. Tex.
Eastern District of Texas · 5th Circuit · TX
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:25-cv-00512 Droddy, Jr. v. Director, TDCJ-CID
Other · Apr 29, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
3 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Eastern District of Texas, a federal district court in TX.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 29, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Director, TDCJ-CID, 1:25-cv-00512 Droddy, Jr and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 1 distinct source.
About This Court
Eastern District of Texas (E.D. Tex.) is a federal district court in the 5th Circuit, TX.
Case Timeline
2 events1:25-cv-00512 Droddy, Jr. v. Director, TDCJ-CID
The court granted a motion to consolidate the case of Smith v. Director, TDCJ-CID with another case, Droddy, Jr. v. Director, TDCJ-CID. This consolidation will allow the court to handle both cases together, potentially streamlining the litigation process. The consolidation may also impact the outcome of the cases.
1:22-cv-00390 Smith v. Director, TDCJ-CID
A Motion was filed.
Press Coverage
1:22-cv-00390 Smith v. Director, TDCJ-CID
Order on Motion for Reconsideration ( 27
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 4 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.