Court appoints counsel in Sisneros v. Stancil et al in District of Colorado

description

Case Summary

The District of Colorado appointed counsel for the plaintiff in Sisneros v. Stancil et al, docket number 23-cv-02604. The appointment ensures the plaintiff has legal representation moving forward in the litigation.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

• • Appointment of counsel
• • Access to legal representation
• • Litigation management

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

D. Colo.

District of Colorado · 10th Circuit · CO

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:23-cv-02604 Sisneros v. Stancil et al

Other · May 12, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

Parties not parsed yet

1 linked entity

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to District of Colorado, a federal district court in CO.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.

Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

About This Court

District of Colorado (D. Colo.) is a federal district court in the 10th Circuit, CO.

Case Timeline

1 event

info

Other May 12, 2026

1:23-cv-02604 Sisneros v. Stancil et al

The court appointed counsel in the case Sisneros v. Stancil et al, docket number 1:23-cv-02604. This means the court assigned a lawyer to represent a party who likely could not secure one on their own. The appointment ensures the party has legal representation moving forward.

description View filing open_in_new