newspaper
legal-news
Silver Nita Mills v. City of Los Angeles et al
24-cv-07823
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
Silver Nita Mills sued the City of Los Angeles and unnamed co-defendants, docket 24-cv-07823. The only docket activity reflected is a scheduling notice, placing the case in early pre-trial proceedings. The underlying claims are not described in the available record. Cases against the City of Los Angeles commonly involve civil rights, personal injury, or employment disputes, but no such characterization is supported here.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Claims against City of Los Angeles unspecified
- • Case in early scheduling phase
- • Co-defendants and their roles unknown
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
3 events
info
Other
April 20, 2026
2:24-cv-04782 Eric Rios v. County of Los Angeles et al
Status Report ( 117
info
Other
April 20, 2026
2:25-cv-12441 Cristina Alvarez et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) ( 12
info
Other
April 20, 2026
2:24-cv-07823 Silver Nita Mills v. City of Los Angeles et al
The court issued a scheduling notice in Mills v. City of Los Angeles, Case No. 2:24-cv-07823 (C.D. Cal.). These administrative notices set deadlines or hearing dates that govern the pace of the litigation. Missing a court-imposed deadline can result in sanctions or dismissal.
Advertisement
newspaper
3 articles
Press Coverage
newspaper
2:25-cv-12441 Cristina Alvarez et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) ( 12
Apr 20, 2026
newspaper
2:24-cv-07823 Silver Nita Mills v. City of Los Angeles et al
Text Only Scheduling Notice
Apr 20, 2026
1 min read
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 3 articles
Timeline events
3 records on file
Last updated
1 hour, 11 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.