2:26-cv-00798 Master Group Global Co Ltd v. MIU LLC
Stipulation ( 11
Shumener Odson & Oh LLP filed a lawsuit against Bralower and others in the United States District Court. The lawsuit is currently in its early stages, with no further information available on record. The case is pending further action.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
W.D. Wash.
Western District of Washington · 9th Circuit · WA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:26-cv-00798 Master Group Global Co Ltd v. MIU LLC
Other · Apr 29, 2026
Coverage
4 articles
3 sources tracked
Participants
2 Defendants, 4 Plaintiffs, 1 Related Organization
9 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Western District of Washington, a federal district court in WA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 29, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Ernesto Santacruz Jr, Joseph Edlow, 1:26-cv-00798 Shumener Odson & Oh LLP and others.
Press monitoring has found 4 related articles from 3 distinct sources.
Western District of Washington (W.D. Wash.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, WA.
The parties filed a joint stipulation.
A new case, Rohit Kumar v. Ernesto Santacruz Jr. et al, was filed in the court, potentially related to the ongoing litigation in Shumener Odson & Oh LLP v. Bralower et al. This new case may impact the existing case or be a separate matter. The exact connection between the two cases is unclear.
The court has acknowledged service of a summons and complaint in a separate case, Siva Matapathi et al v. Joseph Edlow. This action is related to the main case, Shumener Odson & Oh LLP v. Bralower et al, as it involves the same parties or interests. The service of the summons and complaint is a procedural step in the litigation process.
The court granted a motion to seal a document in the case Shumener Odson & Oh LLP v. Bralower et al, case number 1:26-cv-00798. This means that the document will be kept confidential and not publicly available. The court's decision to seal the document is significant because it suggests that the information contained in the document is sensitive or potentially damaging to one of the parties involved.
Stipulation ( 11
Service of S/C Returned Executed as to USA ( 9
Sources tracked
3 outlets · 4 articles
Timeline events
4 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 8 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.