8:24-cv-02232 Seyed Mohsen Nourbakhsh et al v. Antony Blinken
USCA Memorandum/Opinion/Order ( 19
Seyed Mohsen Nourbakhsh and others sued Antony Blinken in a case filed under docket 24-cv-02232. A U.S. Court of Appeals memorandum or opinion was issued on the 19th.
Latest development
Order · April 28, 2026
The court issued an order.
description View filingCourt
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Appellate
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
8:24-cv-02232 Seyed Mohsen Nourbakhsh et al v. Antony Blinken
Order · Apr 28, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated April 28, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Antony Blinken, 8:24-cv-02232 Seyed Mohsen Nourbakhsh.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Seyed Mohsen Nourbakhsh et al v. Antony Blinken is an active civil matter under docket 24-cv-02232.
The dispute currently identifies 8:24-cv-02232 Seyed Mohsen Nourbakhsh on one side and Antony Blinken on the other. The case is currently organized around Antony Blinken, USCA Memorandum/Opinion/Order.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 28, 2026, the docket recorded a order: The court issued an order.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest order produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
The court issued an order.
USCA Memorandum/Opinion/Order ( 19
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
6 hours, 12 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.