Research & Search
Deep litigation intelligence across cases, judges, and legal entities
Cases
4:25-cv-09424 Cement Masons Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California et al v. Ronald R. Nelson Contractor, Inc.
• Filed
In the case titled Cement Masons Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California et al v. Ronald R. Nelson Contractor, Inc., the plaintiffs, a health and welfare trust fund and associated parties, brought a lawsuit against Ronald R. Nelson Contractor, Inc. The case involves claims likely related to labor or employment benefits, given the nature of the plaintiff trust fund. The court docket indicates that an entry of default has been made against the defendant, suggesting that Ronald R. Nelson Contractor, Inc. failed to respond or defend against the complaint within the required timeframe. This procedural step typically allows the plaintiffs to seek a default judgment to recover damages or enforce contractual obligations.
5:25-cv-03274 Josh Vandermeulen et al v. BNSF Railway Co.
• Filed
In the case of Josh Vandermeulen et al v. BNSF Railway Co., plaintiffs have initiated litigation against BNSF Railway Co., alleging claims that are currently subject to a transfer motion. The docket indicates procedural activity related to the transfer of the case, suggesting jurisdictional or venue considerations are at issue. Specific factual allegations or claims have not been detailed in the available information, but the case involves multiple plaintiffs against a major railway company, indicating potential disputes related to transportation, employment, or personal injury matters.
2:26-cv-00641 Yocupicio v. Panda Restaurant Group Inc et al
• Filed
In the case 2:26-cv-00641 Yocupicio v. Panda Restaurant Group Inc et al, the plaintiff Yocupicio has filed a response to a motion submitted by the defendants, Panda Restaurant Group Inc and others. The specifics of the motion and the response are not detailed here, but the case involves a dispute between an individual and a corporate restaurant group. The proceedings are ongoing, with the court yet to issue a ruling on the contested motion. This litigation likely centers on claims related to employment, contract, or business practices given the parties involved.
2:26-cv-00177 L Victwa Muldrow v. PreCheck et al
• Filed
In the case of Victwa Muldrow v. PreCheck et al, docket number 26-cv-00177, the parties have submitted a Joint Report pursuant to Rule 26(f) outlining their discovery plan. This procedural filing indicates that the case is in the early stages of litigation, focusing on organizing the scope and timeline for exchanging evidence and information between the parties. The report aims to facilitate efficient case management and ensure compliance with discovery obligations under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. While specific factual or legal claims are not detailed in the available information, the submission of a Rule 26(f) discovery plan suggests that the dispute involves civil claims requiring formal discovery processes. The involvement of PreCheck, a company known for background screening services, may imply employment or contractual issues, but no substantive allegations are provided.
1:25-cv-02592 Geisick v. Eagle Rock Distributing Company of Colorado, LLC et al
• Filed
In the case 1:25-cv-02592 Geisick v. Eagle Rock Distributing Company of Colorado, LLC et al, the plaintiff Geisick has brought a legal action against Eagle Rock Distributing Company and other associated parties. The case involves a dispute that has resulted in a court order, though specific details of the claims or the nature of the order have not been provided. The parties are engaged in litigation that likely concerns contractual, commercial, or employment-related issues given the involvement of a distributing company and multiple defendants. Without additional information on the order or the underlying claims, the precise facts and procedural posture remain unclear. This case is currently active and involves multiple defendants, indicating potential complexity in the legal and factual issues at hand. The lack of a specified court or detailed description limits the ability to fully assess the procedural context or the substantive legal questions. However, the presence of an order suggests the court has taken some formal action, which may impact the direction of the litigation or the rights of the parties involved.
2:26-cv-03835 Hubbard v. Brinker International Payroll Company, L.P.
• Filed
In the case of Hubbard v. Brinker International Payroll Company, L.P., the plaintiff, Hubbard, has initiated a lawsuit against Brinker International Payroll Company, L.P., asserting claims that have prompted a demand for a jury trial. The specific allegations and factual background of the dispute are not detailed in the available information. The case is identified by docket number 26-cv-03835, but the presiding court is not specified. Given the involvement of a payroll company, the dispute may relate to employment, wage, or payroll processing issues, though this is not explicitly confirmed.
3:25-cv-09638 Naseri v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
• Filed
In the case 3:25-cv-09638 Naseri v. United Parcel Service, Inc., the parties submitted a stipulation and proposed order to the court. While specific details of the dispute are not provided, the filing indicates ongoing procedural or substantive negotiations between the plaintiff, Naseri, and the defendant, United Parcel Service, Inc. The nature of the case likely involves claims against UPS, potentially related to employment, contract, or service issues, given the parties involved. The court's docket reflects active case management and attempts to resolve or streamline issues through agreed orders.
5:24-cv-02036 Maritssa Bonilla-Guerra v. Chaffey College District et al
• Filed
The case 5:24-cv-02036 Maritssa Bonilla-Guerra v. Chaffey College District et al involves a legal dispute between the plaintiff, Maritssa Bonilla-Guerra, and the defendant, Chaffey College District, along with other parties. The docket indicates a motion-related filing, suggesting ongoing procedural activity in the case. Specific factual details and claims are not provided, but the involvement of a college district typically points to issues related to education law, employment, or civil rights within an academic setting. The court handling the case is not specified, and the case remains active as of the latest docket entry.
8:25-cv-02878 Leopoldo Zuniga v. El Camino Asphalt Paving Corp. et al
• Filed
In the case of Leopoldo Zuniga v. El Camino Asphalt Paving Corp. et al, the plaintiff, Leopoldo Zuniga, has filed a lawsuit against El Camino Asphalt Paving Corporation and other defendants. The dispute involves claims likely related to employment or contractual issues, as indicated by the nature of the parties involved. The docket includes a memorandum in opposition to a motion, suggesting ongoing procedural disputes regarding motions filed by one of the parties. Specific facts and claims have not been detailed in the available information.
5:25-cv-03417 Alex Acosta et al v. Pape Material Handling, Inc. et al
• Filed
The case titled Alex Acosta et al v. Pape Material Handling, Inc. et al, docket number 25-cv-03417, involves litigation between the named plaintiffs and the defendant company, Pape Material Handling, Inc. The case record references a procedural event related to termination hearings, indicating a possible dispute over employment or contractual termination issues. Specific factual details and claims are not provided in the available description, limiting the ability to fully outline the dispute's nature or the parties' positions. Despite limited information, the case appears to center on procedural and substantive issues related to termination, potentially involving employment law or contract law principles. The involvement of multiple plaintiffs and a corporate defendant suggests a commercial or workplace-related controversy requiring judicial resolution.
2:26-cv-01615 Ifeoma Chukwurah v. United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al
• Filed
In the case 2:26-cv-01615 Ifeoma Chukwurah v. United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al, the plaintiff, Ifeoma Chukwurah, has filed a complaint against the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and other defendants. The case appears to be in its early stages, as indicated by the issuance of an Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint, which is a procedural step typically outlining the next steps in litigation and ensuring compliance with court rules. Specific factual allegations and claims have not been disclosed in the available information.
1:26-cv-20262 Castro v. Crumbl LLC
• Filed
In the case titled Castro v. Crumbl LLC, docket number 26-cv-20262, the parties have filed a Notice of Settlement, indicating that they have reached an agreement to resolve the dispute outside of court. While specific details of the underlying claims are not provided, the filing suggests that the litigation is concluding without further judicial intervention. The settlement likely addresses the claims brought by Castro against Crumbl LLC, potentially involving contractual, employment, or consumer-related issues given the nature of such disputes.
1:25-cv-09292 Unifor, Inc. v. Markbreit et al
• Filed
The case titled Unifor, Inc. v. Markbreit et al, docket number 25-cv-09292, is currently in the stage of a settlement conference. While specific details of the dispute are not provided, the involvement of Unifor, Inc., a labor union, suggests the matter may pertain to labor relations or employment issues. The settlement conference indicates that the parties are attempting to resolve their differences outside of trial through negotiation and mediation efforts. No further substantive information about the claims or defenses is available at this time.
2:25-cv-11208 Daniel M. Arroyo v. Marathon Refining Logistics Services LLC et al
• Filed
In the case of Daniel M. Arroyo v. Marathon Refining Logistics Services LLC et al, the plaintiff, Daniel M. Arroyo, has initiated legal action against Marathon Refining Logistics Services LLC and other defendants. The case is filed under docket number 25-cv-11208. While specific details of the claims and the court's order are not provided, the litigation likely involves disputes related to employment, contractual obligations, or business operations given the parties involved. The referenced order may address procedural or substantive matters pertinent to the progression of the case.
5:25-cv-03391 Christian Daniel Rilloraza v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
• Filed
In the case of Christian Daniel Rilloraza v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., the plaintiff brought a legal action against the defendant, FedEx Ground, alleging claims related to employment or service conditions. The docket number 25-cv-03391 indicates a civil proceeding, though specific details of the complaint and court rulings are not provided in the available information. An order was issued in the case, but the content and impact of that order remain unspecified.
8:26-cv-00495 Providence Mission Hospital et al v. UFCW Unions and Food Employers Benefit Fund
• Filed
The case titled Providence Mission Hospital et al v. UFCW Unions and Food Employers Benefit Fund, docket number 26-cv-00495, involves a dispute between a hospital entity and a labor union benefit fund. While specific details of the claims are not provided, the parties appear to be engaged in litigation likely related to labor, employment, or benefits issues. The scheduling notice indicates that the court is managing case timelines and procedural matters to move the case forward efficiently.
4:23-cv-00385 Asare v. Envision Physician Services
• Filed
In the case of Asare v. Envision Physician Services, docket number 23-cv-00385, the plaintiff Asare has filed a response opposing a motion submitted by the defendant, Envision Physician Services. The specifics of the motion and the underlying claims are not detailed in the provided information. The case appears to involve a dispute between an individual and a healthcare services provider, likely concerning employment or contractual issues given the parties involved. The opposition filing indicates active litigation and contested legal arguments between the parties.
4:25-cv-01095 Cooper v. RXO Express, LLC, et al.
• Filed
In the case of Cooper v. RXO Express, LLC, et al., docket number 4:25-cv-01095, the court addressed a motion to vacate a prior order or judgment. The details of the underlying dispute are not specified, but the procedural posture indicates that one party sought to set aside a court decision. The case involves a dispute between Cooper and RXO Express, LLC, along with other defendants, suggesting a possible commercial or employment-related matter. The court's consideration of the motion to vacate reflects ongoing litigation dynamics and potential challenges to prior rulings.
1:21-cv-03400 Tapia-Rendon v. Employer Solutions Staffing Group II, LLC et al
• Filed
In the case of Tapia-Rendon v. Employer Solutions Staffing Group II, LLC et al, the plaintiff brought claims against the defendant staffing company. The matter proceeded through litigation and ultimately resulted in a settlement agreement, resolving the dispute outside of trial. Specific details regarding the claims or terms of the settlement have not been disclosed in the public docket entry. This case highlights the resolution of employment-related disputes through negotiated settlements rather than prolonged court proceedings.
1:26-cv-04150 Crenshaw v. GREAT LAKES COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION, L.L.C. d/b/a Reyes Coca-Cola Bottling, LLC
• Filed
In the case 1:26-cv-04150 Crenshaw v. GREAT LAKES COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION, L.L.C. d/b/a Reyes Coca-Cola Bottling, LLC, the plaintiff, Crenshaw, has filed a complaint against the defendant, a beverage distribution company operating under the Reyes Coca-Cola Bottling name. While specific details of the complaint are not provided, the case likely involves allegations related to the defendant's business practices or employment conditions given the nature of the parties involved. The litigation is in its early stages, with the complaint recently filed and the court yet to be identified.