Research & Search
Deep litigation intelligence across cases, judges, and legal entities
Cases
2:24-cr-00553-1 USA v. Laney
• Filed
In the criminal case USA v. Laney, docket number 24-cr-00553, the court issued an order documented as entry 65. While specific details of the order are not provided, the case involves the United States government prosecuting the defendant, Laney, on criminal charges. The procedural posture suggests ongoing litigation in a federal criminal matter, with the court managing pretrial or trial-related issues through formal orders.
Apple Moves to Compel Jon Prosser Cooperation in iOS 26 Trade Secrets Lawsuit
• Filed
Apple is actively seeking to compel tech analyst Jon Prosser to comply with discovery requests in its ongoing trade secrets lawsuit related to iOS 26. Despite being served with subpoenas for documents and deposition testimony on February 3, Prosser has not fully responded. Apple plans to escalate the matter by filing a Motion for an Order to Show Cause in the Northern District of Ohio to enforce compliance with the subpoenas. This development was disclosed in a joint status report filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
Inside the courtroom : Macon County election supervisor , deputy plead not guilty to federal health - care fraud charges
• Filed
Two officials from Macon County's election office, including the election supervisor and a deputy, have pleaded not guilty to federal charges related to health care fraud. The charges allege involvement in a scheme to defraud health care programs, though specific details of the alleged fraudulent activities have not been disclosed. The case highlights the intersection of public officials and federal health care regulations, raising concerns about potential misuse of public office for personal gain. The defendants' not guilty pleas indicate that the case will proceed to further legal proceedings where evidence will be examined. The outcome will depend on the prosecution's ability to prove the alleged fraud beyond a reasonable doubt, and the defense's capacity to challenge the government's claims. This case underscores the federal government's ongoing efforts to combat health care fraud, even when it involves individuals in public service roles.
3:22-cv-03580 In Re Meta Pixel Healthcare Litigation
• Filed
The case titled In Re Meta Pixel Healthcare Litigation, docket number 22-cv-03580, involves litigation concerning the use of Meta Pixel technology within the healthcare sector. The case appears to address issues related to data privacy and the handling of sensitive healthcare information through Meta's tracking tools. A stipulation and proposed order have been filed, indicating ongoing procedural developments in the case. Specific details about the parties involved or the exact claims are not provided in the available information.
2:24-cv-11157 ACS Security, Inc. v. Stratton Security Group Inc.
• Filed
In the case 2:24-cv-11157 ACS Security, Inc. v. Stratton Security Group Inc., ACS Security, Inc. has brought a lawsuit against Stratton Security Group Inc. The dispute centers around allegations likely related to competitive business practices, contract issues, or intellectual property, given the nature of the parties involved in the security services industry. The case is currently pending, with filings available through the court's electronic case filing system, but detailed facts and claims have not been publicly disclosed in the summary provided. The litigation appears to involve complex commercial issues between two companies operating in the security sector.
9:25-cr-80208-1 USA v. Brown
• Filed
In the case titled USA v. Brown, docket number 25-cr-80208, the defendant Brown is involved in a criminal proceeding. The document referenced is a Reply in Support of a Motion, indicating ongoing pretrial or trial litigation activity. While specific facts of the case are not provided, the filing suggests the defense or prosecution is addressing arguments related to a prior motion, potentially concerning evidentiary or procedural issues. The case is part of the federal criminal docket, as indicated by the format of the docket number.
1:26-cv-01879 IDEXX Distribution, Inc. v. PetIQ, LLC
• Filed
The case 1:26-cv-01879 IDEXX Distribution, Inc. v. PetIQ, LLC involves a legal dispute between two companies operating in the pet healthcare and product distribution sectors. While specific claims and factual details are not provided, the filing of a Notice of Appearance indicates that new counsel has entered the case, signaling ongoing litigation activity. The case is currently pending in an unspecified court, with procedural developments continuing as parties prepare for further proceedings.
1:25-cv-04026 Fermion Capital Management AG et al v. Planet Project Solutions LLC et al
• Filed
In the case Fermion Capital Management AG et al v. Planet Project Solutions LLC et al, the plaintiffs, Fermion Capital Management AG and others, have initiated litigation against Planet Project Solutions LLC and additional defendants. The case involves a proposed abstract of judgment, indicating that the plaintiffs are seeking formal recognition and enforcement of a court judgment. The details surrounding the underlying dispute are not specified, but the filing suggests ongoing efforts to secure legal remedies through the court system. As the court and full case facts are not provided, the focus remains on procedural developments related to judgment enforcement.
1:22-cv-09622 Avangrid Networks, Inc. et al v. Security Limits Inc., et al
• Filed
In the case 1:22-cv-09622 Avangrid Networks, Inc. et al v. Security Limits Inc., et al, the plaintiffs, Avangrid Networks, Inc. and affiliated parties, initiated litigation against Security Limits Inc. and other defendants. The case involves disputes likely related to business operations or contractual relationships, as suggested by the parties involved. A recent status report was filed, indicating ongoing procedural developments in the matter. Specific details regarding the claims or defenses have not been disclosed in the provided information.
1:24-cv-00904 IN RE HUT 8 CORP. SECURITIES LITIGATION
• Filed
The case titled IN RE HUT 8 CORP. SECURITIES LITIGATION, docket number 24-cv-00904, involves securities-related claims against Hut 8 Corp. The litigation appears to be currently stayed, indicating that the court has temporarily paused proceedings. Details regarding the specific allegations or claims are not provided, but the case falls within the realm of securities law, likely involving investor disputes or regulatory compliance issues related to Hut 8 Corp. The stay suggests ongoing procedural or substantive matters that require resolution before the case can proceed.
AXS Group LLC Files Withdrawal Motion in Civil Case Against SecureMyPass.com
• Filed
In the case titled AXS Group LLC v. SecureMyPass.com, docket number 26-cv-00361, a withdrawal motion or document was filed as indicated by the referenced docket entry. The specifics of the underlying dispute between AXS Group LLC and SecureMyPass.com are not detailed in the available information. The case appears to involve procedural activity, specifically the withdrawal of a document or motion, which may impact the progression of the litigation.
2:22-cv-09309 Canoo Technologies, Inc. v. Harbinger Motors, Inc. et al
• Filed
In the case of Canoo Technologies, Inc. v. Harbinger Motors, Inc. et al, the plaintiff, Canoo Technologies, initiated litigation against Harbinger Motors and associated parties. The dispute centers around allegations that may involve intellectual property, contractual disagreements, or competitive business practices, given the nature of the parties involved in the automotive and technology sectors. The docket reflects ongoing proceedings, including court orders that shape the litigation's trajectory. Specific details of the claims and defenses remain under seal or are not fully disclosed in the provided information.
2:20-cv-11218 United States of America et al v. Valley's Best Hospice, Inc. et al
• Filed
In the case United States of America et al v. Valley's Best Hospice, Inc. et al, the government brought a civil action against Valley's Best Hospice and associated parties, alleging violations related to healthcare and hospice services. The case involves claims under federal statutes governing healthcare fraud and abuse. A notable aspect of the litigation includes disputes over attorney fees, as reflected in docket entry 218, indicating motions or rulings concerning the allocation or payment of legal costs. The case underscores regulatory enforcement in the healthcare sector and the complexities of litigation involving government claims against healthcare providers.
2:19-cr-00117-28 USA v. Cruz Hernandez el al
• Filed
The case 2:19-cr-00117-28 USA v. Cruz Hernandez et al involves criminal proceedings against multiple defendants, including Cruz Hernandez. The docket entry referenced is an opposition to a motion filed by one of the parties, indicating ongoing litigation and procedural disputes within the case. Specific details about the nature of the charges or the motion opposed are not provided in the available information. The case is part of a broader criminal prosecution, likely involving complex legal arguments and multiple defendants.
2:17-cr-00124-2 USA v. Godoy-Cardenas et al
• Filed
In the criminal case 2:17-cr-00124-2 USA v. Godoy-Cardenas et al, the government prosecutes multiple defendants on charges related to alleged criminal conduct. The docket includes motions and oppositions, such as the Opposition to Motion document filed under docket number 127. The case involves complex legal arguments presented by both the prosecution and defense, addressing evidentiary and procedural issues as the matter proceeds through the court system. Specific details about the charges or the court's rulings are not provided in the available information.
2:26-cv-03572 Michael Haig Krikorian v. Commissioner of SSA
• Filed
In the case of Michael Haig Krikorian v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration (SSA), the plaintiff challenges a decision made by the SSA, likely concerning benefits or administrative determinations. The case has been referred to a U.S. Magistrate Judge, indicating that pretrial matters or discovery issues may be managed by the magistrate to streamline proceedings. While specific factual details are limited, the dispute centers on the administrative actions of the SSA and the plaintiff's rights under applicable social security laws and regulations. The referral to a magistrate judge suggests procedural steps are underway to resolve preliminary issues or facilitate settlement discussions. This case exemplifies common litigation involving government agencies where claimants contest decisions affecting their social security benefits, often requiring judicial review of administrative records and legal standards applied by the SSA.
1:23-cv-16465 Simpson v. Walgreen Co. et al
• Filed
In the case of Simpson v. Walgreen Co. et al, docket number 23-cv-16465, the primary procedural event recorded is the withdrawal of an attorney representing one of the parties. The case details, including the underlying claims or causes of action, are not provided in the available information. The withdrawal of counsel may impact the progression of the case, potentially causing delays or requiring the party to secure new legal representation. Without additional substantive details, the focus remains on the procedural posture rather than the merits of the dispute.
1:24-cv-12720 Dace v. Jaburek et al
• Filed
In the case of Dace v. Jaburek et al, the court addressed a motion for default judgment filed by the plaintiff. The motion was considered after the defendants failed to respond or otherwise defend against the claims brought by Dace. The court's order grants the default judgment, effectively ruling in favor of the plaintiff due to the defendants' lack of participation in the proceedings. This procedural ruling allows the plaintiff to potentially recover damages or other relief as requested in the complaint. The case is at a procedural stage where the plaintiff has secured a favorable judgment by default, pending any further proceedings related to damages or enforcement.
1:25-cv-15387 Okeley et al v. Alstom Transportation USA Inc.
• Filed
In the case 1:25-cv-15387 Okeley et al v. Alstom Transportation USA Inc., the plaintiffs filed a motion seeking leave to file certain documents or claims, which prompted the court to issue an order addressing this procedural request. The details of the motion and the court's ruling on it are part of the ongoing litigation process, reflecting the parties' efforts to shape the scope and content of the case. The case involves disputes between the plaintiffs and Alstom Transportation USA Inc., a company operating in the transportation sector.
Alejandro Gonzalez Files Civil Suit Against Victoria's Secret Stores LLC
• Filed
Alejandro Gonzalez has initiated a civil lawsuit against Victoria's Secret Stores LLC, as indicated by the docket number 26-cv-02950. The case appears to involve a timely opt-out related to a multidistrict litigation or class action context, suggesting that Gonzalez is pursuing individual claims separate from a larger group settlement or proceeding. Specific details about the nature of the claims have not been provided, but the filing indicates a formal legal challenge against the retailer.
Judges & Parties
2:25-cv-01998 Boards of Trustees of the Northwest Ironworkers Health and Security Fund
Legal Entity
Party in litigation matters