Scottsdale Insurance Seeks Discovery Extension in Suit Against BA Crete Corp.
Case Summary
Scottsdale Insurance requested an extension of the discovery cut-off date in its civil suit against BA Crete Corp in the Central District of California, docket 24-cv-10919. The extension aims to allow more time for gathering evidence before trial.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Discovery deadlines
- • Evidence gathering
Docket Snapshot
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:24-cv-10919 Scottsdale Insurance Company v. BA Crete Corp et al
Other · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff, 1 Related Organization
3 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 11, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes BA Crete Corp, Scottsdale Insurance Company and others.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
1 event2:24-cv-10919 Scottsdale Insurance Company v. BA Crete Corp et al
The court extended the deadline for completing discovery in Scottsdale Insurance Company v. BA Crete Corp et al, case number 2:24-cv-10919. This means the parties have more time to gather and exchange evidence before trial. The extension can affect the overall timeline and strategy for both sides.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
18 hours, 33 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.