civil-litigation federal-courts court-watch

Judgment Entered in Schmelzer v. Animal Wellness Center

18-cv-01253 C.D. Cal.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Schmelzer v. Animal Wellness Center of Monee, LLC et al is a civil case filed in the Central District of California under docket number 18-cv-01253. A judgment has been entered in the case, specifically an AO450 judgment. The entry of an AO450 judgment typically signifies the final determination of the rights and liabilities of the parties. The lengthy 185-page summary suggests a complex factual or legal background leading to this final decision.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Final Judgment Entered
  • AO450 Judgment
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

C.D. Cal.

Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

8:18-cv-01253 Orgain, Inc. v. Northern Innovations Holding Corp. et al

Other · Apr 30, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

2 articles

2 sources tracked

groups

Participants

2 Defendants, 2 Plaintiffs

4 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 30, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Animal Wellness Center of Monee, LLC, Northern Innovations Holding Corp, 1:18-cv-01253 Schmelzer and others.

Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 1 day, 7 hours ago

Schmelzer v. Animal Wellness Center of Monee, LLC et al is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 18-cv-01253.

The dispute currently identifies 1:18-cv-01253 Schmelzer and 8:18-cv-01253 Orgain, Inc on one side and Animal Wellness Center of Monee, LLC and Northern Innovations Holding Corp on the other. The case is currently organized around Judgment - AO450.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court issued a Bill of Costs (CV-59) in the case of Orgain, Inc. v. Northern Innovations Holding Corp.

et al, case number 8:18-cv-01253. This document outlines the costs associated with the case. The issuance of the Bill of Costs is a procedural step in.

On April 23, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court entered judgment.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other April 30, 2026

8:18-cv-01253 Orgain, Inc. v. Northern Innovations Holding Corp. et al

The court issued a Bill of Costs (CV-59) in the case of Orgain, Inc. v. Northern Innovations Holding Corp. et al, case number 8:18-cv-01253. This document outlines the costs associated with the case. The issuance of the Bill of Costs is a procedural step in the case.

info
Other April 23, 2026

1:18-cv-01253 Schmelzer v. Animal Wellness Center of Monee, LLC et al

The court entered judgment.

Advertisement
show_chart

Coverage Timeline

newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

14 hours, 28 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.