legal-news

Schlissel et al v. The Islamic Republic of Iran

18-cv-05331
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The case, Schlissel et al v. The Islamic Republic of Iran, has been noted with a notice. The court has not provided additional information on the case. The case is currently pending, and no further information is available at this time.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • notice
  • lack of information
  • pending
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
Advertisement

Case Timeline

7 events
info
Other April 23, 2026

1:25-cv-03905 WILLIAMS v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN

The court has been notified of a new case, Williams v. Islamic Republic of Iran, with docket number 1:25-cv-03905. This case is likely related to the ongoing litigation between the US and Iran, and may involve claims for damages or other relief. The notice indicates that the case has been filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York.

info
Other April 22, 2026

1:18-cv-07306 Ades et al v. Islamic Republic Of Iran

The court entered judgment.

info
Other April 22, 2026

1:18-cv-11876 Moody-Theinert et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran

The court entered judgment.

info
Other April 22, 2026

1:18-cv-12387 Rowenhorst et al v Islamic Republic of Iran

The court entered judgment.

info
Other April 22, 2026

1:18-cv-11837 Abel et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran

The court entered judgment.

info
Other April 22, 2026

1:18-cv-05339 Kamardinova et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran

The court entered judgment.

info
Other April 22, 2026

1:18-cv-05331 Schlissel et al v. The Islamic Republic of Iran

The court entered judgment.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

7 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 7 articles

Timeline events

7 records on file

Last updated

18 hours, 34 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.