Sauer v. Herminstyne et al
Case Summary
Civil case in N.D. Ill. currently marked active. Latest development: 1:21-cv-06555 Sauer v. Herminstyne et al. Coverage tracked from 1 media source.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Docket Snapshot
Court
N.D. Ill.
Northern District of Illinois · 7th Circuit · IL
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:21-cv-06555 Sauer v. Herminstyne et al
Other · May 06, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Northern District of Illinois, a federal district court in IL.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 06, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Herminstyne and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
The Story So Far
Sauer v. Herminstyne et al is an active civil matter in Northern District of Illinois under docket 21-cv-06555.
The main identified defendant or respondent is Herminstyne. Juryvine classifies the matter around civil litigation, federal courts.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 6, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court entered judgment.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
About This Court
Northern District of Illinois (N.D. Ill.) is a federal district court in the 7th Circuit, IL.
Case Timeline
1 event1:21-cv-06555 Sauer v. Herminstyne et al
The court entered judgment.
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
3 hours, 39 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.