legal-news

SARAVIA v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Filed

26-cv-04597
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

A new lawsuit, Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe, was filed in the US District Court for the District of New Jersey. The plaintiff, Strike 3 Holdings, is seeking to identify and hold accountable an individual who allegedly downloaded and distributed copyrighted content without permission. The case was assigned the docket number 2:26-cv-04597.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other April 29, 2026

2:26-cv-04597 Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 45.48.234.58

A new lawsuit, Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe, was filed in the US District Court for the District of New Jersey. The plaintiff, Strike 3 Holdings, is seeking to identify and hold accountable an individual who allegedly downloaded and distributed copyrighted content without permission. The case was assigned the docket number 2:26-cv-04597.

info
Other April 28, 2026

2:26-cv-04597 SARAVIA v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al

The court granted a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the case of Saravia v. The Attorney General of the State of New Jersey, allowing the plaintiff to challenge their detention. This decision enables the plaintiff to argue that their detention is unlawful and seek release. The writ of habeas corpus is a fundamental right that ensures individuals are not unlawfully imprisoned.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

4 days, 11 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.