civil-litigation federal-courts court-watch

Sarah Ronaghi serves summons in civil case against American Express National Bank in CD Cal

25-cv-06305 C.D. Cal.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Sarah Ronaghi has served a summons in a civil case against American Express National Bank in the Central District of California, docket number 25-cv-06305. The case is in its early stages following the issuance of the summons. No further details on the claims or defenses have been disclosed.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Service of summons
  • Civil claim initiation
  • American Express National Bank as defendant
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

C.D. Cal.

Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:26-cv-03247 Kevin Toulson v. American Express National Bank

Other · May 01, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

2 articles

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 2 Plaintiffs

3 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 01, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes American Express National Bank, 2:25-cv-06305 Sarah Ronaghi, 2:26-cv-03247 Kevin Toulson.

Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 1 distinct source.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 3 days, 2 hours ago

Sarah Ronaghi v. American Express National Bank is an active civil matter in Central District of California under docket 25-cv-06305.

The dispute currently identifies 2:25-cv-06305 Sarah Ronaghi and 2:26-cv-03247 Kevin Toulson on one side and American Express National Bank on the other. Juryvine classifies the matter around civil litigation, federal courts, court watch.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On May 1, 2026, the docket recorded a other: A Summons was issued. On April 30, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court issued a scheduling notice in the case of Sarah Ronaghi v. American Express National Bank, indicating that a text-only notice has been filed.

This means that the court is providing a written update on the case's schedule, likely due to the ongoing.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other May 1, 2026

2:26-cv-03247 Kevin Toulson v. American Express National Bank

A Summons was issued.

info
Other April 30, 2026

2:25-cv-06305 Sarah Ronaghi v. American Express National Bank

The court issued a scheduling notice in the case of Sarah Ronaghi v. American Express National Bank, indicating that a text-only notice has been filed. This means that the court is providing a written update on the case's schedule, likely due to the ongoing litigation. The notice is a routine procedural step in the case.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

8 hours, 48 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.