legal-news

Sample v. Village of Burr Ridge et al

26-cv-04783
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The court has been informed of a separate case, 3:26-cv-04783 SCHWERM v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al, which is unrelated to Sample v. Village of Burr Ridge et al. This notification is likely a procedural matter, and its relevance to the main case is unclear. The court will need to review the new case to determine its impact.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
Advertisement

Case Timeline

3 events
info
Other May 4, 2026

2:26-cv-04783 Juarez v. Semaine Health Co.

A Notice of Interested Parties was filed.

description View filing open_in_new
info
Other April 29, 2026

3:26-cv-04783 SCHWERM v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al

The court has been informed of a separate case, 3:26-cv-04783 SCHWERM v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al, which is unrelated to Sample v. Village of Burr Ridge et al. This notification is likely a procedural matter, and its relevance to the main case is unclear. The court will need to review the new case to determine its impact.

description View filing open_in_new
info
Other April 28, 2026

1:26-cv-04783 Sample v. Village of Burr Ridge et al

The plaintiff, Sample, has been granted permission to proceed with their lawsuit without paying the required court fees. This is known as proceeding in forma pauperis. The court has made this decision, allowing Sample to continue with their case against the Village of Burr Ridge and other defendants.

description View filing open_in_new
Advertisement
show_chart

Coverage Timeline

newspaper

Press Coverage

3 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

3 outlets · 3 articles

Timeline events

3 records on file

Last updated

11 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.