Judge Dismisses Restraining Order Request Against Rams WR Puka Nacua
Case Summary
A restraining order request filed by Madison Atiabi against Los Angeles Rams wide receiver Puka Nacua was formally dismissed by a judge on April 14. Atiabi had alleged that Nacua bit her during an incident, leading to the initial filing on March 24. During the hearing, Atiabi's attorney informed the court of their intention to drop the request. The dismissal followed Nacua's recent entry into a drug and alcohol rehabilitation facility. The judge granted the dismissal at the request of the accuser, concluding the matter without further legal action at this time.
Key Issues
- • Restraining order procedures
- • Allegations of personal injury
- • Withdrawal of legal claims
- • Impact of rehabilitation on legal proceedings
- • Judicial discretion in dismissing requests
Case Timeline
1 eventRuling Made On Restraining Order Request Against Puka Nacua
A woman's restraining order request filed against Los Angeles Rams wide receiver Puka Nacua stemming from an incident in which she claimed he bit her was formally dismissed by a judge at her request on Tuesday (April 14). Accuser Madison Atiabi's attorney, Joseph Kar, told Judge Debra R. Archuleta that he and his client intended to drop the request they previously submitted on March 24 during a hearing in a Los Angeles County courtroom after Nacua recently entered rehabilitation. Nacua is in rehabilitation at a facility for drug and alcohol rehabilitation,” said Kar, who appeared remotely.