RUBIO v. CREDENCE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC
Case Summary
Judge Mashkin denied a motion in the case of Mashkin et al v. Rubio, which is related to the case of RUBIO v. CREDENCE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC. This decision has significant implications for the ongoing litigation. The details of the motion and the judge's reasoning are not specified.
Latest development
1:25-cv-01784 RUBIO v. CREDENCE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC
Order · April 30, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingDocket Snapshot
Court
D.D.C.
District of Columbia · D.C. Circuit · DC
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:26-cv-11950 Mashkin et al v. Rubio
Other · Apr 30, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
4 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of Columbia, a federal district court in DC.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 30, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes CREDENCE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
About This Court
District of Columbia (D.D.C.) is a federal district court in the D.C. Circuit, DC.
Case Timeline
2 events1:26-cv-11950 Mashkin et al v. Rubio
Judge Mashkin denied a motion in the case of Mashkin et al v. Rubio, which is related to the case of RUBIO v. CREDENCE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC. This decision has significant implications for the ongoing litigation. The details of the motion and the judge's reasoning are not specified.
1:25-cv-01784 RUBIO v. CREDENCE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC
A Motion was filed.
Press Coverage
1:25-cv-01784 RUBIO v. CREDENCE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC
Order on Motion to Dismiss ( 22
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 1 hour ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.