newspaper
2:25-cv-15170 BAYMONT FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC. et al v. DEVELOPER INN ORLANDO NORTH LLC et al
Status Report ( 27
Apr 27, 2026
1 min read
legal-news
Rogers v. Well Path et al
25-cv-15170
D.N.J.
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
Rogers v. Well Path et al is a case currently pending in the court system. The case is identified by docket number 25-cv-15170, but the current summary is unknown. Further information is needed to provide a more detailed summary.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Rogers v. Well Path et al
- • 25-cv-15170
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
fact_check
Docket Snapshot
account_balance
Court
D.N.J.
District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ
tag
Docket
Not captured
Civil
timeline
Stage
Active litigation
Active
event
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
new_releases
Latest Filing
2:25-cv-15170 BAYMONT FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC. et al v. DEVELOPER INN ORLANDO NORTH LLC et al
Other · Apr 27, 2026
newspaper
Coverage
3 articles
3 sources tracked
groups
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
6 linked entities
gavel
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 27, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes DEVELOPER INN ORLANDO NORTH LLC, 2:25-cv-15170 BAYMONT FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC and others.
Press monitoring has found 3 related articles from 3 distinct sources.
About This Court
District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
3 events
info
Other
April 27, 2026
2:25-cv-15170 BAYMONT FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC. et al v. DEVELOPER INN ORLANDO NORTH LLC et al
The parties filed a joint status report.
info
Other
April 24, 2026
3:26-mj-70567-1 USA v. Rogers
An affidavit was filed.
info
Other
April 24, 2026
1:25-cv-15170 Rogers v. Well Path et al
The court granted a motion to seal documents in the Rogers v. Well Path et al case, citing concerns for patient confidentiality and the potential for harm to the parties involved. This decision allows the parties to keep certain information private, but may also limit public access to the case. The ruling is significant because it sets a precedent for future cases involving sensitive patient information.
Advertisement
show_chart
Coverage Timeline
newspaper
3 articles
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
3 outlets · 3 articles
Timeline events
3 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 7 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.