Robert Wright et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Case Summary
The court denied Volkswagen Group of America's motion to dismiss a lawsuit filed by Robert Wright and others, allowing the case to proceed. The lawsuit alleges that Volkswagen's diesel vehicles were equipped with software that cheated on emissions tests. This ruling is significant because it allows the plaintiffs to continue pursuing their claims against Volkswagen.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Docket Snapshot
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
5:24-cv-02171 Robert Wright et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Other · May 01, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff, 1 Related Organization
3 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 01, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Volkswagen Group of America, Inc, 5:24-cv-02171 Robert Wright and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
About This Court
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
1 event5:24-cv-02171 Robert Wright et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
The court denied Volkswagen Group of America's motion to dismiss a lawsuit filed by Robert Wright and others, allowing the case to proceed. The lawsuit alleges that Volkswagen's diesel vehicles were equipped with software that cheated on emissions tests. This ruling is significant because it allows the plaintiffs to continue pursuing their claims against Volkswagen.
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
21 hours, 16 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.