civil-litigation federal-courts

Northern District of Illinois dismisses Ricardo v. John Doe USBP Agents for failure to state claim

25-cv-13493 N.D. Ill.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The court dismissed the civil complaint in Ricardo v. John Doe USBP Agents, docket number 25-cv-13493, for failure to state a claim. The dismissal indicates the plaintiff's allegations did not meet the legal threshold to proceed.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Failure to state a claim
  • Civil rights
  • Border Patrol agents
  • Pleading standards
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

N.D. Ill.

Northern District of Illinois · 7th Circuit · IL

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

1:25-cv-13493 Ricardo v. John Doe USBP Agents

Other · May 11, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant

1 linked entity

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Northern District of Illinois, a federal district court in IL.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 11, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes John Doe USBP Agents.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

About This Court

Northern District of Illinois (N.D. Ill.) is a federal district court in the 7th Circuit, IL.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other May 11, 2026

1:25-cv-13493 Ricardo v. John Doe USBP Agents

The court dismissed the case Ricardo v. John Doe USBP Agents for failure to state a claim. This means the plaintiff's complaint did not present sufficient legal grounds to proceed. The dismissal ends the lawsuit unless the plaintiff amends the complaint to fix the deficiencies.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

1 day ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.