1:24-cv-09627 Gioliver v. Otis Bantum Correctional Facility et al
Pro Se Payment of Fee - Processed
Reynolds v. The Woodbridge Township Board of Education et al is a civil case with a current status of. The case was filed in the unknown court with docket number 24-cv-09627. The current status of the case is unknown.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:24-cv-09627 Gioliver v. Otis Bantum Correctional Facility et al
Other · May 05, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
2 Defendants, 2 Plaintiffs
4 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes WOODBRIDGE TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, Otis Bantum Correctional Facility, 2:24-cv-09627 REYNOLDS and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.
The court processed a payment related to a separate case, Gioliver v. Otis Bantum Correctional Facility et al, which is not directly related to the Reynolds case. This payment is likely for a filing fee or other court costs associated with the Gioliver case. The Reynolds case remains unaffected by this event.
The court granted a motion to stay the proceedings in the case of Reynolds v. The Woodbridge Township Board of Education et al, effectively halting the case's progress. This decision was made in response to a request from the defendants. The stay will remain in place until further notice.
Pro Se Payment of Fee - Processed
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 1 hour ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.