4:25-cv-00395 MidFirst Bank v. Wolf-Heath, et al.
Default Judgment ( 21
Reuter filed a civil suit against the American Medical Association and others in the District of Colorado. The case bears docket number 25-cv-00395. The substance of the claims and the current procedural posture are not yet disclosed.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
D. Colo.
District of Colorado · 10th Circuit · CO
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
4:25-cv-00395 MidFirst Bank v. Wolf-Heath, et al.
Other · May 08, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff, 1 Related Organization
5 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to District of Colorado, a federal district court in CO.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 08, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes American Medical Association, MidFirst Bank and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
Reuter (PS) v. American Medical Association et al is an active civil matter in District of Colorado under docket 25-cv-00395.
The dispute currently identifies 1:25-cv-00395 Reuter (PS) on one side and American Medical Association on the other. The case is currently organized around Federal jurisdiction and procedural posture, Current docket activity and next procedural step, Healthcare regulation, providers, and patient-care disputes, Pending motions, orders, and near-term docket movement.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On April 27, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court denied the plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, meaning they cannot hormanally proceed with the case without paying the required filing fee. This decision is significant because it may force the plaintiff to drop the case or pay the fee.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
District of Colorado (D. Colo.) is a federal district court in the 10th Circuit, CO.
The court entered judgment.
The court denied the plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, meaning they cannot hormanally proceed with the case without paying the required filing fee. This decision is significant because it may force the plaintiff to drop the case or pay the fee, potentially ending the lawsuit. The plaintiff, Reuter, had filed a complaint against the American Medical Association and others.
Default Judgment ( 21
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
3 days, 3 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.