bankruptcy court-watch

RestoPro770 Inc. v. Haberman et al: Bankruptcy Transmittal of Designated Record to District Court Filed in 26-cv-80483

26-cv-80483 S.D. Fla.
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The court has received a bankruptcy transmittal of designated record to district court in the case of RestoPro770 Inc. v. Haberman et al, case number 26-cv-80483. The transmittal is a standard document that outlines the procedures for transmitting the record to the district court. The court has not yet taken any action on the transmittal.

No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.

Key Issues

  • Bankruptcy Transmittal of Designated Record to District Court
  • 26-cv-80483
  • RestoPro770 Inc. v. Haberman et al
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

S.D. Fla.

Southern District of Florida · 11th Circuit · FL

tag

Docket

Not captured

Bankruptcy

timeline

Stage

Active litigation

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

9:26-cv-80483 RestoPro770 Inc. v. Haberman et al

Other · Apr 27, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

1 article

1 source tracked

groups

Participants

1 Plaintiff, 1 Related Organization

3 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Southern District of Florida, a federal district court in FL.

The newest docket activity we have is a other dated April 27, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes 9:26-cv-80483 RestoPro770 Inc and others.

Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 18 hours, 44 minutes ago

RestoPro770 Inc. v. Haberman et al: Bankruptcy Transmittal of Designated Record to District Court Filed in 26-cv-80483 is an active bankruptcy matter in Southern District of Florida under docket 26-cv-80483.

The main identified plaintiff or petitioner is 9:26-cv-80483 RestoPro770 Inc. The case is currently organized around Bankruptcy Transmittal of Designated Record to District Court, RestoPro770 Inc. Haberman et al.

The court has received a bankruptcy transmittal of designated record to district court in the case of RestoPro770 Inc. Haberman et al, case number 26-cv-80483. The transmittal is a standard document that outlines the procedures for transmitting the record to the district court.

The court has not yet taken any action on the transmittal.

On April 27, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court has received a bankruptcy transmittal of a designated record from the bankruptcy court to the district court in the case of RestoPro770 Inc. This transmittal is a routine step in the bankruptcy process, where the bankruptcy court.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest other produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

About This Court

Southern District of Florida (S.D. Fla.) is a federal district court in the 11th Circuit, FL.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
info
Other April 27, 2026

9:26-cv-80483 RestoPro770 Inc. v. Haberman et al

The court has received a bankruptcy transmittal of a designated record from the bankruptcy court to the district court in the case of RestoPro770 Inc. v. Haberman et al. This transmittal is a routine step in the bankruptcy process, where the bankruptcy court sends relevant documents to the district court for further proceedings. The significance of this event lies in its indication that the bankruptcy court has completed its review of the case and is now transferring the matter to the district court for resolution.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

18 hours, 44 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.