Renato Rivas awarded EAJA fees in civil case against Martin O'Malley in California
Case Summary
Renato Rivas was awarded fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) in the civil case against Martin O'Malley in the Central District of California. The award compensates Rivas for legal expenses incurred against a government defendant.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • EAJA fee award
- • Government defendant
- • Central District of California jurisdiction
Docket Snapshot
Court
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:24-cv-09727 Renato Rivas v. Martin O'Malley
Other · May 12, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 12, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Martin O'Malley, Renato Rivas.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
1 event2:24-cv-09727 Renato Rivas v. Martin O'Malley
The court awarded attorney's fees to Renato Rivas under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) in the case against Martin O'Malley. This means the court found that Rivas was the prevailing party and that the government's position was not substantially justified. The fee award shifts the cost of legal representation from Rivas to the government.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 day, 14 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.