Juryvine tracks Trademark Office across litigation, regulatory sagas, source feed signals, and related entities. This page shows what is present in the record and avoids inferring penalties, liability, or enforcement outcomes unless source documents support them.
Regulatory footprint
3
linked cases
3
active
1
courts
0
sagas
D.D.C. 26-cv-00584
Defendants in Morales v. Comenity Bank sought a 30-day extension to file their answer in the District of Columbia. The court considered this routine procedural request to avoid undue delay.
D.D.C. 25-cv-00423
Hill filed a civil lawsuit against Putman and others in the District of Columbia, docket 25-cv-00423. The initial partial filing fee has been paid, marking the commencement of the case with no further substantive activity reported.
Court unknown No. 10
Federal Circuit Reverses PTAB Ruling that Some Centripetal Network Threat Detection Patent Claims are Non-Obvious is a case with docket number No. 10. The current summary is a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) that reversal is warranted where only one answer is supported by substantial evidence and there is neither a
In Federal Circuit Reverses PTAB on Non-Obviousness of Centripetal Network Patent Claims
In Federal Circuit Reverses PTAB on Non-Obviousness of Centripetal Network Patent Claims
In Federal Circuit Reverses PTAB on Non-Obviousness of Centripetal Network Patent Claims
In Defendants seek 30-day extension to answer complaint in Morales v. Comenity Bank
In Defendants seek 30-day extension to answer complaint in Morales v. Comenity Bank
In Hill files civil lawsuit in D.C. with initial partial filing fee paid